Unconventional thinking about the Middle East.

Friday, February 02, 2007

Al-Qaeda Claims Credit for Helicopter Shoot-Down (Update, Saturday, February 3, 2007)

The 'Islamic State of Iraq', the organization that fronts for Al-Qaeda in Iraq, has issued a press release (Arabic) taking credit for shooting down the Black Hawk helicopter that crashed in the Taji area (north of Baghdad) today, resulting in two American fatalities.

Let's hope that the American press would at least mention this claim when reporting the story; it is further proof that what is referred to as the 'Sunni insurgency' is increasingly becoming Al-Qaeda's war against the Americans and the Shi'as in Iraq.

The US media has been using the generic term 'insurgent' to describe the militants even when groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq are claiming credit for specific attacks. This practice has got to end, and the American audience needs to be told that America's soldiers are actually fighting Al-Qaeda when engaging 'insurgents' in Iraq.

UPDATE: the Al-Qaeda release identified the helicopter as an Apache helicopter and not a Black Hawk, as I had written above.

FOLLOW UP, Saturday, February 3, 2007:

This is how the New York Times covered it today (Marc Santora, ‘2 Killed as U.S. Helicopter Is Shot Down Near Baghdad,’ February 3, 2007, p. 7):

Before the military had confirmed the crash, a militant group was already taking responsibility and promising to post a video of the attack on the Internet.

The Washington Post was only slightly better (Ernesto Londono, ‘U.S. Copter Crash in Iraq Kills 2 In Fourth Such Incident This Year,’ February 3, 2007, p. 11):

Military officials did not say what type of helicopter it was or how it crashed. But Iraqi police and an insurgent group that asserted responsibility for the crash identified the craft as an Apache and said it had been shot down by a shoulder-fired antiaircraft missile.

“We are saying to the enemies of God that the airspace of the Islamic state of Iraq is prohibited for you, just like its land,” the Islamic State of Iraq, a Sunni insurgent group, said in a statement posted on its Web site. “God opened for the soldiers of the Islamic State of Iraq new ways to confront your aircrafts.”

At least the WaPo story mentioned the ‘Islamic State of Iraq,’ but neither it nor the NYT piece made mention of that spooky yet related word: Al-Qaeda. Isn’t it a bit misleading to say that the Islamic State of Iraq is just another ‘Sunni insurgent group’? Isn’t the fact that it is a front for Al-Qaeda relevant to the war on terror?

The editors of those two papers certainly seem to think that the Al-Qaeda affiliation is not relevant to the story that their readers get to see, and hence, not relevant to the debate in the United States over Iraq.

There is something very troubling about that.

I wonder how they are going to cover what’s transpired in today’s news, namely Al-Qaeda revealing its new military offensive in Iraq under the name ‘The Dignity Plan’.

Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, the head of the Islamic State of Iraq, announced the plan in an audio message posted on several jihadist websites today (I will write about it soon). Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, Zarqawi’s successor as head of Al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia, had pledged allegiance to al-Baghdadi in early November 2006.

As part of Al-Qaeda's new ‘Dignity’ offensive, the Islamic State of Iraq has issued press releases today claiming credit for the bombings in Kirkuk (eight bombings), and the fighting in the city of Mosul (a curfew was declared), and in Diyala and Salahuddin provinces.

How will the media dodge the Al-Qaeda affiliation now?

If it were up to me, I’d think that the point I made in my Turnaround in Baghdad column a couple of weeks ago is very relevant: battling the insurgency now essentially means battling Al Qaeda.

UPDATE, Sunday, February 4, 2007:

Both Sunday print editions of the New York Times and the Washington Post make not mention of Abu Omar al-Baghdadi/Islamic State of Iraq/Al-Qaeda.

The Iraq-related stories they carry today describe the violence in Kirkuk, Baghdad and Mosul, but make no mention of Al-Qaeda’s press releases claiming responsibility for that violence.

It’s astounding, and I can’t find any possible rationale behind these omissions. Is there a media blackout that we’re unaware of?

Yesterday’s Associated Press story (Byline: Steven R. Hurst) confuses Abu Omar al-Baghdadi with Abdullah Rashid al-Baghdadi (whose name is rendered in the AP story as Abu Abdullah Rashid al-Baghdadi), the head of the now-defunct Shura Council of the Mujaheddin; I think that Abu Omar and ‘Abdullah Rashid are two different persons:

An Iraqi militant group tied to al-Qaida in Iraq announced, meanwhile, it had launched its own new strategy to counter the coming U.S.-Iraqi crackdown.

In an audiotape posted on a Web site commonly used by the insurgents, a voice purported to be that of Abu Abdullah Rashid al-Baghdadi, also known as Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, said the group would "widen the circle of battles" beyond Baghdad to all of Iraq. Al-Baghdadi heads The Mujahedeen Shura Council, an umbrella organization of insurgent groups in Iraq.


Blogger das411 said...

"The US media has been using the generic term 'insurgent' to describe the militants even when groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq are claiming credit for specific attacks. This practice has got to end, and the American audience needs to be told that America's soldiers are actually fighting Al-Qaeda when engaging 'insurgents' in Iraq."

That would not only require research and intellectual exercise for the talking heads of America's Worst Generation, but it also does not neatly fit the template of "Bush's Fault!! Dems in 08!" Plus Nancy Pelosi et al say that Iraq is not a part of the War On Terror, haven't you heard?

/sarcasm off

Mr. Kazimi, your President or Prime Minister could come to Washington, speak to a joint session of our Congress, and say "Al Qaeda is killing Iraqis every day and if you do not stay to defeat them they will come for you too," and blue-state voters + American media elites would shrug it off, if they even hear it at all. This blog and others like it are extremely useful for those of us who care to actually learn the truth about what is happening over there, and so long as you have this voice then by all means keep speaking and sharing! People can learn more from your posts than from any US media report...

11:53 PM, February 02, 2007

Blogger Robert said...

Nibras, here's the DNI Open Source Center's translation of the ISI statement claiming the downing of the Apache.


Originally published on 2/2/2007 by Jihadist Websites -- OSC Report in Arabic

Terrorism: Islamic State of Iraq Claims Downing Apache Helicopter in Al-Taji 2 Feb

On 2 February, a jihadist website posted a statement issued by The Islamic State of Iraq in which the group claimed responsibility for downing an Apache helicopter in Al-Taji area on Friday morning, 2 February, and promised to release a film of the operation. The statement was attributed to the Ministry of Information, the "official source" of the Islamic State of Iraq.

A translation of the statement follows:

"In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.

Praise be to God, Lord of all creation. Prayers and peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all his family and companions.

In the morning of this blessed day of Friday, 15 Muharram 1428, corresponding to 2 February 2007, the Air Defense Brigade of the Islamic State of Iraq in the Al-Taji area, near the petroleum depot (Albu-Assaf areas) was able to down an Apache helicopter, burning it completely, and we shall bring you the film [of the operation], God willing. We say to the enemies of God, 'the skies of the Islamic State of Iraq are as forbidden to you as is its ground.' God Almighty has shown the soldiers of the Islamic State of Iraq new ways to confront your air force. Praise and gratitude be to God. As for the Islamic nation everywhere we say that the winds of victory are blowing in the Land of the Two Rivers. Do not withhold any effort in supporting its children in the Islamic State of Iraq, at least with supplications.

'And Allah hath full power and control over His affairs; but most among mankind know it not' [Koranic verse; Joseph 12:21].

Oh God, Revealer of the book, Disperser of the clouds, Defeater of the Confederates, crush the cunning rejectionists, the Zionist Crusaders, and their allies. Oh God, make them and their weapons and war stuff easy prey for Muslims. Oh God destroy them and shake them.

Oh Lord, You are the one who helps us and the one who assists us, with Your Power we move and by Your Power we fight. On You God we rely and You are our cause.

Oh God, retaliate against them, cause them distress, like you did Pharaoh and his nation. Oh God, afflict their country with floods, economic strife, and famine. Oh God, defeat them, destroy them, for You are the All Strong, the Almighty.

God is great. 'Honor belongs to Allah and His Messenger, and to the Believers; but the Hypocrites know not' [Koranic verse; The Hypocrites 63:8].

The Islamic State of Iraq

Ministry of Information"

8:15 PM, February 03, 2007

Anonymous Anonymous said...

As it can certainly always be reported folks stars zjfgksy benefit from getting into oakley frogskins in the personalized variations. Along with these kinds of patterns are generally individual for the children. As a result, while the idea happens to the part of fans, these kind of oakley frogskins are set up approximately related to the patterns ones. while correctly as being a happening comes about, that is, your fans in the accurate Oakley place on Oakley sunglasses of these accurate variations. In addition, these are on the way to almost never change his or her style throughout getting into oakley jawbone .Your younger looking girls-oriented Oakley sunglasses, by way of example, are generally actually common. These kind of sun glasses could be the effects involving reduction regular along with cool issues jointly. specifically can be additional, your charges involving oakley flak jacket may be affordable. This has confirmed that will plenty of buyers will probably pay for the children. And thus, oakley radar can invest in just about any shade as well as any kind Oakley sunglasses whenever they similar to. Your component can be the belief that fans will certainly adhere to your patterns in the idols, of course getting into Oakley sunglasses.Normally, duplicate Oakley sunglasses may be affordable.

2:23 AM, July 14, 2011

Anonymous Anonymous said...

In terms of an example, any striking brow pub huyg7lp on your own Cheap Oakley Sunglasses may well efficiently attract viewers' consideration away from the hair loss brain. Alternatively, huge Oakley Frogskins together with towering wats or temples may well seem excellent about guys that have extended noses. This is the next principle in which can be applied about Oakley Frogskin regarding guys. Several guys believe here is the hardest a single. One of the most essential things concerning investing in a best couple of elegant Oakley Radar is always to realize which usually model of shape could be right for an Oakley Radar Sunglasses individual.

4:08 AM, July 27, 2011

Blogger Unknown said...

thanks for information
obat Asma Disertai Batuk Pada Anak
distributor qnc di indragiri hulu provinsi riau
obat tumor mata
distributor qnc di kota depok jawa barat
agen resmi qnc jelly gamat di kota cirebon
agen resmi qnc jelly gamat di indramayu
obat herbal epilepsi
harga dan tata cara pembelian qnc jelly gamat

1:48 AM, September 07, 2017

Blogger Unknown said...

canada goose jackets
fitflops shoes
nike soldes
nike outlet
pandora charms
pandora charms outlet
true religion outlet
coach outlet
pandora charms
true religion outlet

6:47 PM, June 10, 2018


Post a Comment

<< Home